The GASB 87 pronouncement represents a significant shift in how leases are accounted for in governmental financial statements. For many years, lease obligations were treated differently depending on their structure, often leading to inconsistencies and limited transparency. With the introduction of this standard, governments are required to recognize most leases on the balance sheet, providing a clearer picture of long-term financial commitments. Understanding GASB 87 is essential for finance officers, auditors, and public administrators who want to ensure compliance and improve the accuracy of financial reporting.
The Background of GASB 87
The GASB 87 pronouncement was issued by the to modernize lease accounting for state and local governments. Prior to this standard, lease accounting was governed by older guidance that categorized leases as either operating or capital leases. This approach often allowed significant lease obligations to remain off the balance sheet.
As leasing arrangements became more complex, stakeholders demanded greater transparency. Investors, taxpayers, and oversight bodies wanted a better understanding of how leases affected a government’s financial position. GASB 87 was designed to respond to these concerns by creating a single model for lease accounting.
What the GASB 87 Pronouncement Covers
At its core, the GASB 87 pronouncement establishes a new framework for identifying, measuring, and reporting leases. Under this standard, a lease is defined as a contract that conveys control of the right to use another entity’s nonfinancial asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
This definition emphasizes control rather than ownership. If a government controls the use of an asset and receives the benefits from it, the arrangement is likely considered a lease under GASB 87.
Assets Commonly Affected
- Buildings and office space
- Land and land improvements
- Vehicles and transportation equipment
- Machinery and specialized equipment
By applying this broader definition, GASB 87 captures many agreements that were previously treated as simple operating expenses.
Recognition and Measurement Under GASB 87
One of the most important aspects of the GASB 87 pronouncement is the requirement to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use asset at the start of the lease term. This represents the government’s obligation to make lease payments and its right to use the leased asset.
The lease liability is measured as the present value of expected future lease payments. The right-to-use asset is initially measured based on the lease liability, adjusted for certain items such as prepaid lease payments or incentives.
Key Measurement Components
- Lease term, including reasonably certain renewal periods
- Fixed lease payments
- Discount rate used for present value calculations
- Initial direct costs, if applicable
This approach aligns governmental lease accounting more closely with economic reality.
Short-Term Leases and Exceptions
Not all leases fall under the full requirements of GASB 87. The standard provides an exception for short-term leases, generally defined as leases with a maximum possible term of 12 months or less. These leases may continue to be recognized as outflows of resources, similar to previous operating lease treatment.
This exception reduces administrative burden for governments with minor or temporary leasing arrangements while still ensuring that long-term commitments are properly reported.
Lessee and Lessor Accounting
The GASB 87 pronouncement addresses both sides of a lease arrangement. Most discussions focus on lessee accounting, but governments acting as lessors also face changes. Lessors are required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, reflecting the future lease payments they expect to receive.
This dual perspective ensures consistency and comparability across governmental financial statements.
Differences Between Lessee and Lessor Roles
- Lessees recognize a lease liability and right-to-use asset
- Lessors recognize a lease receivable
- Revenue recognition follows the lease term
- Both parties must assess control and lease terms
Understanding these distinctions is critical for governments involved in multiple leasing arrangements.
Implementation Challenges
Implementing GASB 87 can be complex, especially for governments with large lease portfolios. Identifying all lease agreements, gathering accurate data, and calculating present values require coordination across departments.
Many organizations had to inventory existing contracts, some of which were decades old. In addition, determining the appropriate discount rate and evaluating renewal options required professional judgment.
Impact on Financial Statements
The GASB 87 pronouncement has a noticeable impact on balance sheets. Governments that previously reported minimal lease obligations may now show significant liabilities and assets. While this does not necessarily mean financial health has declined, it does provide a more complete picture of long-term commitments.
Statement of activities and cash flow statements may also change, as lease-related expenses are recognized differently over time.
Benefits of GASB 87
Despite the challenges, GASB 87 offers several advantages. Transparency is improved, making it easier for users of financial statements to understand the scope of leasing activities. Comparability across governments is enhanced because all entities follow a consistent lease accounting model.
In the long term, better information supports more informed decision-making by policymakers and the public.
Key Benefits
- Improved financial transparency
- More accurate representation of obligations
- Enhanced comparability across governments
- Better long-term financial planning
Relationship to Other Accounting Standards
The GASB 87 pronouncement aligns conceptually with lease standards issued for private-sector entities, though important differences remain. These differences reflect the unique nature of governmental operations, including budgetary considerations and public accountability.
Understanding GASB 87 alongside other GASB standards helps finance professionals maintain a consistent and compliant reporting framework.
Preparing for Compliance
Successful adoption of GASB 87 requires planning and communication. Governments often form cross-functional teams involving finance, legal, procurement, and operations staff. Training and updated accounting systems also play a critical role.
Clear documentation of assumptions and judgments is essential, particularly for auditors reviewing compliance.
The GASB 87 pronouncement represents a major evolution in governmental lease accounting. By requiring most leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, it enhances transparency and accountability in public financial reporting. While implementation can be challenging, the long-term benefits of clearer information and improved comparability are significant. For governments committed to strong financial management, understanding and applying GASB 87 is an important step toward more accurate and meaningful reporting.
2/2