Jannik Sinner’s Doping Scandal: Why the Silence from Tennis Media?


When information broke that Italian tennis star Jannik Sinner examined constructive for the banned substance clostebol twice, one may need anticipated a media storm.

In spite of everything, doping scandals in sports activities, particularly involving prime athletes, often result in days, if not weeks, of intensive protection, punditry, and infinite headlines.

But right here we’re, two months later, and the tennis world stays largely silent. Mainstream tennis journalists have performed every part wanting a disappearing act, fastidiously memory-holing the affair.

One may marvel: Why the blackout? Why has this high-profile case barely been lined within the tennis media?

The reply is an apparent one: it’s a battle of curiosity, and it runs deep.

Present me the stakeholders and inform me the stakes, and I’ll paint you an image of how they may behave.

Defending the Golden Boys of Tennis

sinner erasinner era

Jannik Sinner is considered one of tennis’ rising stars. His potential has been touted since he first broke into the scene by successful the NextGen Finals in 2019.

He represents the way forward for tennis in a post-Large Three world. With Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer both retired or winding down their careers, tennis desperately wants new superstars.

The tennis institution has invested closely in Sinner, and his marketability and clean-cut picture are invaluable to sponsors, tournaments, and media platforms. A doping scandal involving him may tarnish Sinner’s popularity and the broader tennis model.

It’s no shock, then, that protection of his case has been conspicuously absent. Sponsors don’t wish to be related to a tarnished determine, and tennis journalists—a lot of whom have shut ties to gamers and organisations—could also be unwilling to chew the hand that feeds them.

Tennis journalism is usually a comfortable affair, with journalists granted insider entry to gamers, coaches, and occasions. However that entry comes at a value: the unstated rule is to not rock the boat.

Sadly, it’s fantasy to talk of the tennis media as those that work in investigative journalism, bravely searching for new truths, following the story wherever it leads, and fearlessly reporting the data they’ve unearthed.

You can not belief folks whose lives and careers are on the road to police the game that pays their wages; you may as nicely invite Benson and Hedges to find out the risks of smoking. All you’ll get is ream upon ream upon ream of dissembling.

But this appears to be how they’ve dealt with the Sinner case.

The Journalists’ Dilemma: Between Fact and Entry

mixed zonemixed zone

Entry to gamers is every part for tennis journalists. With out it, they lose their lifeblood—unique interviews and the power to journey the circuit with the celebs.

Sinner is a fan favorite and media darling, and criticising him too harshly or giving his case an excessive amount of consideration may burn bridges.

It’s not laborious to see why a doping case involving a prime participant may quietly be swept below the carpet. In spite of everything, the individuals who management entry to gamers and occasions are additionally those who stand to lose probably the most if a scandal blows up.

The stakes are excessive. Gamers like Sinner generate hundreds of thousands in sponsorship offers, promote out stadiums, and appeal to profitable TV rankings.

Bear in mind, Sinner has a $158M Nike deal, a Gucci sponsorship, and a Rolex sponsorship. These sponsors additionally fund the ATP and Grand Slams, which fund the ITIA and pay cheap compensation to the Chair, who upheld Sinner’s enchantment. A battle of curiosity, you may say?

Exposing a doping case dangers all of that. It dangers angering sponsors, followers, and the ATP, all of whom are vested in maintaining the game’s picture squeaky clear.

The Casus Belli: Why No One Needs to Handle WADA’s Attraction

wada appeal sinnerwada appeal sinner

In late September, the World Anti-Doping Company (WADA) filed an enchantment to the Courtroom of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) towards the ruling that Sinner had “no fault or negligence” for his two constructive clostebol exams.

WADA is searching for a one- to two-year ban, signalling that it believes the Worldwide Tennis Integrity Company (ITIA) mishandled the case.

But, the place are the articles about this from prime tennis shops? Why aren’t reporters digging into the implications of WADA’s enchantment? Journalists can be throughout it if this have been every other sport or participant.

However right here’s the uncomfortable fact: tennis media doesn’t wish to problem the established order.

The ITIA, ATP, and different governing our bodies have each purpose to downplay this case, and to date, they’ve succeeded.

By sustaining a low profile on this matter, they’ll proceed to current tennis as a clear sport whereas hoping that Sinner’s defence—that the constructive take a look at was on account of secondary transmission from his physiotherapist—will maintain up below scrutiny.

When “No Fault” Isn’t Sufficient

clostebolclostebol

However let’s not child ourselves—two constructive exams for a banned substance aren’t any small matter. The truth that the ITIA accepted Sinner’s defence doesn’t essentially imply it’s hermetic.

WADA disagrees, as evidenced by their enchantment. The media silence round this enchantment ought to concern anybody who cares concerning the integrity of the game.

But tennis journalists have primarily stayed mum. Is it as a result of they don’t wish to query a ruling from the ITIA, an organisation funded by the ATP, whom they depend on for entry and data?

Or is it as a result of they don’t wish to tarnish the popularity of a participant whose success performs a starring function in the way forward for tennis?

It’s probably each.

Observe the Cash

prize money leadersprize money leaders

In the long run, this can be a basic case of following the cash. Sinner is a useful commodity to the tennis world, and something threatening his rise to stardom is horrible for enterprise.

The mainstream tennis media, tied to the identical stakeholders who profit from his success, have little incentive to show this scandal.

Like foxes guarding the henhouse, the folks supposed to research and report on these points have their very own pores and skin within the sport. And so long as that is still the case, don’t count on rather more protection of Jannik Sinner’s doping case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *