Taylor Fritz and Frances Tiafoe will play in certainly one of Friday’s semi-finals after the American pair superior from Tuesday’s quarter-finals.
No matter occurs, certainly one of them would be the first American man to succeed in a Grand Slam singles ultimate since Andy Roddick at Wimbledon in 2009.
Fritz was the primary to progress, taking part in a stable match in opposition to Sascha Zverev to defeat the 4th seed in 4 units earlier than Frances Tiafoe went by way of after Dimitrov retired within the fourth set.
Given the stakes and the huge openness of the draw on this half, all 4 guys can have been conscious of the huge alternative to make a slam ultimate, so the standard of each matches wasn’t nice.
Fritz vs Sascha featured two guys destroying the ball, each from method behind the baseline. Except for a few prolonged rallies that completed with one thing particular, little creativity was supplied.
However, Tiafoe vs. Dimitrov contained some enjoyable shot-making and plenty of really feel, however total, it was crammed with errors and never the very best high quality.
Highlights and stats from each matches are under 👇
Day 9 US Open 2024 Quarter Closing Outcomes
| Winner | Loser | Scoreline |
|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz (12) | Alexander Zverev (4) | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) |
| Frances Tiafoe (20) | Grigor Dimitrov (9) | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 4-1 RET |
Fritz Makes Maiden Grand Slam Semi-Closing
Taylor Fritz is into his first Grand Slam semi-final after overcoming Alexander Zverev 7-6(2), 3-6, 6-4, 7-6(3) in three hours and 26 minutes.
Fritz hadn’t received any of the 4 main quarter-finals he’d performed in, however he was the extra constant and aggressive participant on Tuesday.
The American received their final encounter at Wimbledon in 5 units, and this match performed out equally. It was a baseline battle with each guys going toe to toe, however Zverev broke down extra typically and missed some large forehands on the details.
Total, there was little to separate them, and I believed Zverev had the extra spectacular photographs, however Fritz was steadier and extra composed through the larger moments.
Zverev was sensible on his backhand wing however extra tentative on the forehand, and I believed he performed too passively.
Sure, he was hitting the ball laborious, however he was caught 6 ft behind the baseline and by no means actually received on the entrance foot to dictate play.
Stats-wise, you may barely separate them, so it comes all the way down to Fritz feeling good on the day and searching extra motivated to get the job carried out.
I really feel wonderful. I’ve had plenty of appears at quarter-finals prior to now couple of years, and at this time simply felt completely different. I actually really feel that it was my time to take a step additional and it’s solely becoming I’m doing it right here on this court docket on the [US] Open in entrance of this crowd. You understand how useful having a giant serve is. However you get to some extent the place, on the prime of the sport, your serve comes again a bit of extra. Particularly in opposition to these guys, who’re usually fairly good from the bottom. I’ve labored on including a lot to my sport. I really feel like my forehand and backhand have sort of all the time been there, however I’m making an attempt to come back to the online a bit of bit, making an attempt to combine in some drop photographs, simply making an attempt so as to add stuff to my sport so I can again up my serve in higher. Fritz on his win.
Match Stats
| Taylor Fritz | Alexander Zverev | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 14 |
| Double Faults | 5 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Share | 63% | 71% |
| 1st Serve Factors Gained | 81% (66/81) | 75% (77/103) |
| 2nd Serve Factors Gained | 53% (25/47) | 48% (20/42) |
| Break Factors Saved | 50% (2/4) | 85% (11/13) |
| 1st Return Factors Gained | 25% (26/103) | 19% (15/81) |
| 2nd Return Factors Gained | 52% (22/42) | 47% (22/47) |
| Break Factors Transformed | 15% (2/13) | 50% (2/4) |
| Winners | 45 | 52 |
| Unforced Errors | 48 | 42 |
| Web Factors Gained | 67% (16/24) | 78% (29/37) |
| Max Factors In Row | 7 | 5 |
| Service Factors Gained | 71% (91/128) | 67% (97/145) |
| Return Factors Gained | 33% (48/145) | 29% (37/128) |
| Whole Factors Gained | 51% (139/273) | 49% (134/273) |
| Max Video games In Row | 3 | 3 |
| Service Video games Gained | 90% (19/21) | 91% (20/22) |
| Return Video games Gained | 9% (2/22) | 10% (2/21) |
| Whole Video games Gained | 49% (21/43) | 51% (22/43) |
Highlights
Tiafoe Tops Injured Dimitrov
After Dimitrov’s five-set win over Andrey Rublev, I had important considerations about his potential to get better for the quarter-final as he intimated within the press that his hardcourt summer season had been suffering from a few accidents that he’d struggled to shake off.
That commentary proved right. Throughout the latter phases of the third set, Dimitrov’s motion and baseline energy noticeably diminished, seemingly as a result of a leg challenge.
He referred to as for the physio and acquired therapy off-court after the third set. Nonetheless, regardless of persevering with for just a few video games, he retired three hours and 4 minutes into the match, giving Tiafoe a 6-3, 6-7(5), 6-3, 4-1 victory. (on a facet word, why not simply play out these two video games to conclude the match, attempt to hit a winner on each return and roll in some serves, job carried out)
Earlier than the damage, I don’t assume both man performed that properly. The blueprint to beat Tiafoe is to increase the rallies, however Dimitrov didn’t have that in his locker final night time, so he performed aggressively. That labored in elements, like when he snatched the second set by recovering a break of serve, however 11 double faults and 51 unforced errors are too excessive.
Clearly, it’s not the way in which I wish to get by way of. However clearly pleased to get by way of. One other semi-final right here. Unbelievable Tiafoe on his win.
Match Stats
| Grigor Dimitrov | Frances Tiafoe | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Double Faults | 11 | 5 |
| 1st Serve Share | 55% | 50% |
| 1st Serve Factors Gained | 75% (53/71) | 74% (39/53) |
| 2nd Serve Factors Gained | 37% (22/59) | 67% (36/54) |
| Break Factors Saved | 57% (8/14) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st Return Factors Gained | 26% (14/53) | 25% (18/71) |
| 2nd Return Factors Gained | 33% (18/54) | 63% (37/59) |
| Break Factors Transformed | 25% (1/4) | 43% (6/14) |
| Winners | 38 | 26 |
| Unforced Errors | 51 | 37 |
| Web Factors Gained | 52% (12/23) | 55% (17/31) |
| Max Factors In Row | 6 | 8 |
| Service Factors Gained | 58% (75/130) | 70% (75/107) |
| Return Factors Gained | 30% (32/107) | 42% (55/130) |
| Whole Factors Gained | 45% (107/237) | 55% (130/237) |
| Max Video games In Row | 3 | 5 |
| Service Video games Gained | 67% (12/18) | 94% (16/17) |
| Return Video games Gained | 6% (1/17) | 33% (6/18) |
| Whole Video games Gained | 37% (13/35) | 63% (22/35) |
Highlights
US Open Day 10 Quarter Closing Matches
- Jannik Sinner (1) vs Daniil Medvedev (5)
- Jack Draper (25) vs Alex de Minaur (10)